Federal Fighter Fiasco

Anyone who follows defence issues in Canada is well aware of the Liberal government’s ongoing plan to sole-source 18 Boeing Super Hornet fighters to augment our current legacy Hornet fleet. This is to be an “interim” measure, with the new planes only flying until a final replacement for the legacy Hornets is complete. The explanation for the new jets is a capacity shortfall, a shortfall that did not exist until the government decided that the Royal Canadian Air Force needed the capacity to meet both NATO and NORAD commitments simultaneously.

It is hard to argue that being able to meet both missions at the same time is a bad idea. In the event of a threat to our European allies, we can reasonably expect that the aggressor will also test North American air defences. If we lack the capacity to do both missions, we will find ourselves pulled out of European defence in order to defend our homeland.

While I can agree with the need to fill both our major alliance commitments concurrently, it is hard to agree with the naked politics of the decision process. There is no reason, none that makes sense, that Canada cannot immediately launch a fighter aircraft competition. We are so very well prepared after all the false starts that we could very nearly start the competition before the end of business.

We are not starting the competition though. In fact, it will not start for some time. A completely avoidable delay brought about by political needs rather than military. This multi-billion dollar strategic political manoeuvre will unnecessarily strain both the RCAF and the defence budget.

Canada needs, as every country does, to maximize the value of our hard-earned defence dollars. That value though needs to be value to the country, not to the ruling party. This is not what we see if we take even a cursory look at the interim Super Hornet program. That program is designed to buy a government time, to push back making a real decision that might represent a broken promise not to purchase the F-35 Lightning II.

There is another, if less obvious, promise at risk here: Peace, Order and Good Government. Every government has a responsibility to maintain those three basic functions of our country. Making defence decisions based on partisan political needs is not Good Government.

A government that breaks an election promise needs to be questioned. One that breaks the commitment to Good Government needs to be censured.

This is not a hard call to make.

Advertisements

15 year veteran of the Canadian Armed Forces. I now write to let the thoughts in my head get out where I can see 'em. :)

Posted in Canadian Forces, RCAF

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

Follow DefenceMuse on WordPress.com
Canadian ~ American Strategic Review

CASR has announced that it will cease operations on 31/December/2016.

I have grateful to have been given the opportunity to write for them, and to repost my material on Defence Muse.

Previous Posts
February 2017
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728  
%d bloggers like this: